Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17104 (JHR)

SHARWAN KUMAR @ GUDDU PAAJI @ SHARWAN KUMAR NIRMALKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5432/2026 · 2026-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17650 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5432 of 2026 ------ Sharwan Kr @ Guddu Paaji @ Guddu Paaji @ Sharwan Kumar Nirmalkar, age 32 years Son of Punit Ram Nirmalkar R/o Qtr. No. 95/T2 Shani Mandir Harijan Basti Loco Colony P.O. Parsudih P.S. Parsudih town Jamshedpur District- East Singhbhum Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. S.K. Srivastava, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No. 96 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted gold jewellery, watch and idols of God made up of gold and silver. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and without putting the petitioner on TIP, charge sheet has been submitted against him as mentioned in para-12 of this petition. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 31.10.2025, as mentioned in para 17 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamshedpur in connection with Kadma P. S. case no. 96 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.06.2026 Vedanti/