[2026:JHHC:17713] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5446 of 2026 ------ Habib Momin, Aged about 35 years, Son of Johar Ali, Resident of- Village Manihari Tola, Bhatta, P.O. Fudkipur, Dakshin Sarfarajganj P.S.- Radhanagar, District- Sahebganj, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Deepak Kr. Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Jabir Ansari, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.434 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 191 (2), 191 (3), 115 (2), 117 (2), 118 (1), 109 (1), 103 (1), 126 (2), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly committed murder of Belal Momin and attempted to murder Jalal Momin. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the specific allegation of assault upon Belal Momin is upon Jiyaul Momin and Hafeza Bewa and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons assaulted Jalal Momin. It is further submitted that neither Jalal Momin has sustained any injury nor any injury report of Jalal Momin is available in the record. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.434 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-18.06.2026-Animesh/