Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17101 (AP)

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v. VENNEPURI VENKATA RAMANA

MACMA/156/2019 · 2026-01-07

T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010075232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 156/2019 Between: 1. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM ...APPELLANT AND 1. VENNEPURI VENKATA RAMANA, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. GANDHAM GURULINGAM, VIZIANAGARAM 3. AVADA MALLASWAMY, VIZIANAGARAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 23 days in filing the M.A.C.M.A against the Judgment and award in M.V.O.P.No. 273 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - Cum- II Addl.District Judge, Vishakhapatnam, Dated 07th August, 2018 and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 TCDS,J MACMA No.156 of 2019 To grant stay of operation of the decree and Judgment in M.V.O.P.NO.273 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -Cum-II Addl.District Judge, Visakhapatnam, dated 07th August, 2018, pending disposal of the main C.M.A., and pass. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. NARESH BYRAPANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO 2. G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 TCDS,J MACMA No.156 of 2019 The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the appellant addressed a letter dated 26.12.2025 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The said letter is placed on record. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 08.01.2026 KGR