Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1710 (ALL)

SACHIN KUMAR (WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE F.I.R. AS ATUL KUMAR) v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/8822/2026 · 2026-05-06

Ajay Kumar Ii, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8822 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and a charge-sheet has been forwarded on 17.04.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. May 7, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sachin Kumar (Wrongly Mentioned In The F.I.R. As Atul Kumar) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad