ANKUSH KUMAR @ ANKUSH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH A.C.B.
B.A./5484/2026 · 2026-06-18
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17099 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17099 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17659
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5484 of 2026
Ankush Kumar @ Ankush, S/o Indrasan Yadav … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through A.C.B.
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Advocate
---
03/18th June 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Dhanbad A.C.B. P.S. Case No. 01/2026 corresponding to Special (Vigilance) Case No. 02/2026 for the offence registered under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-X-cum-Special Judge (ACB), Dhanbad.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a case relating to trap of the petitioner, the petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2026. He submits that the petitioner is a Junior Engineer and there is an allegation that he had demanded money in connection with disbursement of amount relating to MGNREGA Scheme. The learned counsel submits that the money was not recovered from the petitioner. However, he submits that the charge-sheet has not yet been submitted.
3.
Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner ran away from the spot and threw the money on the way from his back pocket and when he was apprehended, his pant was dipped in sodium carbonate solution which turned pink.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and it
2026:JHHC:17659
2
appears that due process for trap was followed and the cloths of the petitioner was washed in chemical solution, which turned pink which shows involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence , this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected.
5. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 18.06.2026
Uploaded On:
Mukul/-