IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11879 of 2026 Jangya Narayan Nayak …. Petitioner Ms. S. Nayak, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 06.05.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly consider this application of the petitioner with direction to the Opp. Party No.2 to dispose of the representation dtd. 05.04.2026 vide annexure -2 within a stipulated period, by releasing all financial benefits under ORSP Rules 2017 with due consideration of Annexure 3 for the interest of justice and equity. And/or pass/ passes appropriate order /orders as deem fit. p. 2 p. 2 And for this act of your kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-2 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-2 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti