Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17092 (AP)

BALLA INDIRA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4472/2026 · 2026-02-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010075642026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4472/2026 Between: 1. BALLA INDIRA, , W/O MOHAN MARUTHI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DHARAMPURI ROAD, ADITYA GARDEN, PLOT NO. 11, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522236 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. - 535001 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 535001 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM RURAL POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 535001 6. SRI BAMMIDI CHANDRA RAO, , S/O LATE DURGAYYA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 2-231, DHARMAPURI ROAD, VENKATESWARA COLONY VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY AND DISTRICT. 535001 7. SMT BAMMIDI APPIYAMMA, W/O CHANDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 2 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 2-231, DHARMAPURI ROAD, VENKATESWARA COLONY VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY AND DISTRICT 535001 8. SRI BAMMIDI SATTIBABU, S/O CHANDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 2-231, DHARMAPURI ROAD, VENKATESWARA COLONY VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY AND DISTRICT. 535001 9. SRI BAMMIDI UMA, W/O SATTIBABU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 2-231, DHARMAPURI ROAD, VENKATESWARA COLONY VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY AND DISTRICT. 535001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T DIWAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.3 to 5, in not considering the PGRS (Public Grievance Redressal System) dated 10-11-2025 vide Grievance No. VZM202511106575 and in not providing police protection/aid to the petitioner, despite the injunction order dated 01-12-2020 in I.A.No. 286 of 2020 in O.S.No.477 of 2020 on the file of Honble Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Vizianagaram in respect of the land an extent of 122.66 Sq. Yards, being vacant site situated in Survey No. 34/3 plot No. 44 of Vizianagaram Municipality, Vizianagaram Mandal and District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to provide police protection/aid to the petitioner…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. T. Diwakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that although the petitioner has obtained an interim injunction order from the competent civil court, the police authorities have failed to provide protection inspite of repeated representations. 4. Per contra, Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that if any order is passed either by the civil court or by this Court, appropriate action would be taken to extend protection to the petitioner, subject to the availability of staff in the police department and that Respondent No.6 is presently in possession of the disputed property 5. On perusal of the record, the petitioner has obtained an order in I.A.No.286 of 2020 in O.S.No.477 of 2020 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram. However, the petitioner has not approached the said civil court seeking specific relief of police aid. 4 6. Be that as it may, since the interlocutory application is pending before the learned Civil Court, the petitioner is required to work out his remedies before the learned Civil Court. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 17.02.2026 PRA 5 243 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4472 of 2026 Date: 17.02.2026 PRA