DIOCESE OF JAMMU SRINAGAR SOCIETY TH. FR. SEBASTAIN NAGATHUNKAL v. NAIB TEHSILDAR, AKHNOOR AND OTHERS
CM(M)/142/2026 · 2026-07-08
Rajnesh Oswal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1709 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1709 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 119 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 142/2026
Diocese of Jammu Srinagar Society …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ajay Bakshi, Advocate.
V/s
Naib Tehsildar, Akhnoor & Ors. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sagira Jaffar, Advocate.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 08.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred an application for setting aside the proceedings/ recall of order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Akhnoor. He further submits that the petitioner is seeking innocuous relief for directing the said Divisional Magistrate, Akhnoor (Appellate Court) to decide the application stated to have been filed by the petitioner within stipulated time.
2. Issue notice. Notice is waived by Ms. Sagira Jaffar, learned counsel on behalf of the official respondents.
3. There is no need to serve other respondents, as such, the present petition is disposed of by directing the SDM, Akhnoor (Appellate Court) to decide the application preferred by the petitioner in accordance with law. Needless to say that this Court has not examined the merits of the application stated to have been filed by the petitioner.
CM(M) No. 142/2026
2
4. This Court is sanguine that SDM shall decide the said application in accordance with law as expeditious as possible.
(Rajnesh Oswal) Judge
JAMMU
08.07.2026. Neha-1
Neha Kumari 2026.07.09 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document