Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1709 (AP)

Smt.Shaik Kudhan Beby, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9266/2026 · 2026-04-08

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010164952026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 9266/2026 Between: 1. SMT.SHAIK KUDHAN BEBY,, W/O.CHINNA MEERA, AGE.57 YEARS, DR.NO.1-164, YERRAMREDDY NAGAR, RAMPACHODAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, OF POLAVARAM DISTRICT-533288. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, VELAGAPAUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522101. 2. THE ADDITIONAL AGENT TO GOVERNMENT AND PROJECT OFFICER ITDA, RAMPACHODAVARAM, POLAVARAM DISTRICT-533288 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR TW, RAMPACHODAVARAM, POLAVARAM DISTRICT-533288 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDAL, POLAVARAM DISTRICT-533288 5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, TRIBAL WELFARE, RAMPACHODAVARAM MANDAL, POLAVARAM DISTRICT- 533288. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the LTRP No.66/2017, dt.26-02-2026 issued by the 3rd respondent rejecting the LTR Petition filed by the petitioners of their land to Dwelling House Dr.No.1-164 in Sy.No.120/2, extent of 0.11 cents situated at Yerramreddy Nagar, Rampachodavaram Village and Mandal, Polavaram District as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the order passed by the 3rd respondent in LTRP No.66/2017, dt.26-02-2026 in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to dispossess the petitioner from their House bearing Dr.No.1-164 in Sy.No.120/2, extent of 0.11 cents situated at Yerramreddy Nagar, Rampachodavaram Village & Mandal, Polavaram District, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATYA PRASAD KOLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.9266 of 2026 ORDER: 1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a request to grant liberty to the Writ Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 09.04.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 60 WRIT PETITION No.9266 of 2026 Dated: 09.04.2026 chs