Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17086 (KAR)

SRI ANANTH KUMAR v. STATE BY

CRL.P/5505/2023 · 2026-02-10

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9396 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5505 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SRI ANANTH KUMAR S/O BALARAM K. T., AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT BALARAM, NO.19/14 28TH CROSS ROAD, 7TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 011. 2. SRI GANESH K., S/O ANANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT BALARAM, NO.19/14 28TH CROSS ROAD, 7TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 011. …PETITIONERS (BY MISS NANDINI B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9396 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2023 STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SMT. KAUSTUBHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS W/O SRI SHRAVAN R/AT BALARAM, NO.19/14 28TH CROSS ROAD, 7TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI G.DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01.10.2018 TAKING COGNIZANCE AND ISSUING PROCESS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 354, 323, 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC R/W SEC. 3 AND 4 OF THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT IN C.C.NO.27517/2018 (CR.NO.245/2018 REGISTERED IN JAYANAGARA POLICE STATION) PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9396 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are before this Court calling in question order dated 01.10.2018, passed by the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru District, in C.C.No.27517/2018, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 354, 323, 506 r/w. 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.2 in unison submit that the parties to the lis were before the concerned Court in O.S.No.25863/2018 and have settled their dispute amicably by drawing up certain terms and conditions and therefore, they are before this Court seeking quashment of the proceedings by permitting them to compound the offences. The parties have filed a joint memo and the photocopies of the order sheet of the concerned Court and the joint compromise petition before this Court. 3. The joint memo reads as follows: “5. During the pendency of the above suit, the Hon'ble Court had referred the matter before the mediation and the parties have entered into compromise - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9396 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2023 before the City Civil Judge in O.S.No.25863/2018 and the same has been filed before the Hon'ble Court on 20-01-2026. The compromise has been accepted before the Court and the terms of the compromise which is produced herewith for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court as DOCUMENT NO.1. 6. In-view of the settlement between the parties to the petition, the Respondent No.2 husband Sri. K.Shravana had executed a Registered Release Deed in favour of the Petitioner No.1 and further the Petitioner No.1 had issued a Demand Draft No.623983 dated 01-01-2026, drawn on Canara Bank, in favour of Sri.K.Shravana the husband of Respondent No.2. 7. The Respondent No.2 and the Petitioner No.1 had withdrawn all the allegation made in the complaint and the suit, to put an end to the long litigation. 8. The Respondent No.2 had received a Demand Draft as stated above before this Hon'ble Court today. 9. In-view of the settlement before the Civil Court, the Respondent No.2 has no objection to quash the proceeding as prayed.” In the light of the fact that the parties have arrived at settlement and since it is a marital dispute, I deem it appropriate to accept the joint memo and terminate the proceedings against the petitioners, as the allegations are not against the State. 4. For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9396 CRL.P No. 5505 of 2023 ORDER (i) The criminal petition is disposed. (ii) The order dated 01.10.2018, passed by the II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.27517/2018 and all further proceedings taken thereto, stand quashed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66