Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:17852 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5099 of 2026
Sagar Kumar Yadav, son of Banshi Yadav.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, APP
--- 02/19.06.2026
Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2026 in connection with CID Cyber P.S. Case No.141/2025, registered under Sections 318 (2)/ 318 (3) / 318 (4)/ 319 (2)/ 336 (2) / 336 (3) / 338/ 340 (2) / 61 (2) of BNS and under Section 66 (B), 66 (C ) / 66 (D) of the IT Act, now pending in the court of learned A.J.C. – II – cum – Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Ranchi.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has further submitted that there is confessional statement of the petitioner wherein he had confessed that he along with the co-accused persons cheated near about 19 lakhs and he received Rs.1,95,000/- through credit card from the aforesaid amount. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only Rs.1,95,000/- is alleged to have been found in his account and the account has been frozen.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties, it appears that the present case is a case of organized crime and part proceeds of the crime has been found in the account of the petitioner, accordingly, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is
2026:JHHC:17852 2
rejected.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:19.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:19.06.2026