IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.850 of 2026 Date of decision:21.07.2026 Sangat Singh ...Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging violation of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 13977 of 2025 dated 30.08.2025. 2. Mr.Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel for the respondent, has placed on record a copy of the office order dated 14.11.2025, and submits that the judgment has been complied with. However, some amount of interest remains to be paid to the present petitioner and the same shall be paid positively within a period of four weeks from today. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 3. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the time being, the petition can be closed, with liberty reserved to him to file appropriate application for the revival of the present contempt petition in case any of the grievances of the petitioner still remains unaddressed. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for, along with pending application(s), if any. (Romesh Verma) Judge 21st `July, 2026. (vt)