Prakash Babu vs. HRTC and others CMP No.2583 of 2026 in Execution Petition No.692 of 2025 06.04.2026 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation has produced copy of communication dated 27.03.2026 issued by the Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Solan, Unit and Annexure-A. The same are taken on record. 2. A perusal of Annexure-A reveals that an amount of Rs.61,680/- and Rs.50,188/- has been paid to the petitioner towards interest on DCRG and leave encashment, respectively. 3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment has been complied with, the application for revival is rendered infructuous. However, in case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can avail remedy, if any, available to him, under law. 4. The application is accordingly disposed of. April 06, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge