Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17073 (BOM)

Suvrna Sunilkumar Gaikwad v. Mansing Dhondi Gujar Through LRs Kishor Mansing Gujar

IA/944/2026 · 2026-10-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

66-IA-944-2026-(C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 944 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 414 OF 2016 Suvrna Sunilkumar Gaikwad … Applicant V/s. Mansing Dhondi Gujar Through Lrs Kishor Mansing Gujar … Respondents Mr. Arjun Mohite i/b Mr. Kirankumar Phakade, advocate for the Applicant Ms. Gunjan Shah, advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(e) CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : OCTOBER 8, 2026 P.C.: 1. This Interim Application has been filed to bring on record legal heirs of deceased Appellant No. 7. 2. Ms. Gunjan Shah, appearing for Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(e) has objected to the allowing of this Interim Application. 3. I have heard counsels for the parties and I have gone through the contents of the Interim Application. 4. It is the case of the Applicant that the Applicant was not aware about the legal provisions as regards to bringing the legal heirs on record. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay be 1/2 Iresh IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2026.10.08 19:04:31 +0530 66-IA-944-2026-(C).docx condoned and the application be allowed. 5. I am convinced with the argument made by the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 6. Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 7. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 Iresh