Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17073 (AP)

V VASMIDHAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3442/2019 · 2026-03-11

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010077042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3442/2019 Between: 1. V VASMIDHAR, S/O.LATE VENKATESWARA PRASAD, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O.NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM, A.P. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA TOWN POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 5. P V RAMANA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOW VACANCY RESERVE, ATTACHED TO THE DIG ELURU RANGE, ELURU. 6. NARRA KRISHNA RAO, S/O. LATE NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RIO RAITHU PETA, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SMT NARRA INDRANI, W/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O RAITHU PETA, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 8. NARRA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O RAITHU PETA, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or other proceedings more particularly one in the writ of mandamus directing the CB CID of State of Andhra Pradesh to take over the investigation of my complaint registered as FIR No.8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by taking over the records from the Nandigama Town Circle Office and to investigate it and to file necessary charge-sheets or final reports before the Courts IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by the respondents 3 & 4 during the pendency of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAUMENE SURAPARAJ KARLAPALEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3442 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or other proceedings more particularly one in the writ of mandamus directing the CB CID of State of Andhra Pradesh to take over the investigation of my complaint registered as FIR No.8 of 2018 of Nandigama Town Police Station by taking over the records from the Nandigama Town Circle Office and to investigate it and to file necessary charge-sheets or final reports before the Courts and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and Sri Yallabandi Ramatirtha, learned counsel for respondent Nos.6 to 8 are in attendance. 4. The writ petition is filed seeking transfer of the case to C.I.D. Department for investigation. 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader already submitted that the case in Crime No.08 of 2018 registered against unofficial respondents on the file of Nandigama Town Police Station, has already been transferred to C.I.D. Department on 08.07.2019. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 6. In the light of above submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader that the case was already been handed over to C.I.D. police for investigation, as requested by the writ petitioner, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 4 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.03.2026 Pmk 5 65 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3442 OF 2019 Date: 12.03.2026 Pmk