Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17071 (GAU)

RATNAWALI DEVI v. PREETAM SAIKIA AND 4 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/105/2020 · 2026-01-05

Anjan Moni Kalita

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010037792020 2026:GAU-AS:154 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/105/2020 RATNAWALI DEVI W/O- SRI BIRENDRA CHANDRA SARMA, VILL- GOMTHAPARA, P.O- DEODHANIGHAT, P.S- SIPAJHAR, DIST- DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN- 784147 VERSUS PREETAM SAIKIA AND 4 ORS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPTT (SEC), DISPUR, GHY- 06, ASSAM 2:PHANIDHAR JIDUNG THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 ASSAM 3:MADHAB DEKA IAS THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DARRANG DISTRICT CIRCLE MANGALDAI PIN- 784147 DIST- DARRANG ASSAM 4:DIGANTA RAJBONGSHI THE PRINCIPAL OF BURHINAGAR COLLEGE MOHALIAPARA P.O- BURHINAGAR DIST- DARRANG Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM PIN- 784147 5:MAHESH BASUMATARY THE SIPAJHAR TREASURY MANGALDAI DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 78412 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R C DAS, MR S C DAS,MR P BURAGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MR. D SAIKIA,MR S M T CHISTIE,MR. S NEOGI,MR. P K BORAH BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 06.01.2026 Heard Mr. H. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already got the relief that was sought for. Therefore, the contempt petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel for the respondent has also stated that the relief sought for in the connected writ petition has already been received by the petitioner and therefore, nothing survives in the instant contempt petition. In view of the aforesaid submission made, the instant contempt petition is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant