PRAKASH CHAND GURJAR SON OF RAM PRASAD GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2869/2026 · 2026-02-13
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17069 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17069 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7022] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2869/2026 Prakash Chand Gurjar Son Of Ram Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Repla, Tehsil Bakani, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Skill Planning And Entrepreneurship Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.).
2. The Director, Directorate Of Technical Education (Training, E-6, Residence Road, Jodhpur (Raj.)
3. The Superintendent Cum Superintendent Cum Principal, Government Industrial Training Institute, Pidawa, District Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttam For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 13/02/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submitted that the petitioner was earlier working as 'Guest Faculty Instructor' at ITI, Pidawa, District-Jhalawar, however, his services were discontinued.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has served one representation in the form of legal notice upon the respondents, however, till date no decision over the legal notice has been taken by the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to submit a fresh representation in
[2026:RJ-JP:7022] (2 of 2) [CW-2869/2026] the light of order dated 17.12.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.24129/2025 (Dinesh Chandra Paneri vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.).
4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondents, who shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/38