1 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.4010 OF 2003 & TR.A.S.NO.3518 OF 2004) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 4010 of 2003 and TRANFER APPEAL SUIT No.3518 of 2004 COMMON JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) These appeals have been filed by the appellants, aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 06.01.2003 passed in O.S. No. 143 of 1984 and O.S. No. 164 of 1984 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalli. O.S.No.143 of 1984 i.e., the suit for rendition of accounts was dismissed. O.S.No.164 of 1984 i.e., the suit for recovery of amount filed by the plaintiff-Bank was decreed. 2. Sri M. Bala Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the appellants, appearing through virtual mode, submits that the sole appellant has died and that the appeals have abated and be dismissed as such. 3. On perusal of the record, we find that both the appeals were filed by more than one appellant, and when confronted, learned counsel insisted „sole appellant‟ and on our request to see the array of parties, he submits that he is not having the records of the appeals with him. 4. Counsels statement carry weight and is required to be made with responsibility. Appearance is through virtual mode and without file. 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.4010 OF 2003 & TR.A.S.NO.3518 OF 2004) 5. The matters have not been argued. The Appeal Suits are dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 20.01.2026. JLV/RPD. 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.4010 OF 2003 & TR.A.S.NO.3518 OF 2004) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) FIRST APPEAL NO: 4010 of 2003 and TRAS.No.3518 of 2004 Date: 20.01.2026 RPD.