[2026:RJ-JP:3884] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 341/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2059/2018 Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Shri Sadhu Ram Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Solangya Ki Dhani, Village Bishangarh, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Santosh Dullar Manager Bank Of Maharashtra, Zonal Office, 6Th Floor, Fortune Heights, C-94, Near Ahinsa Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001. 2. Shri Mukesh Kumar, Fn Manager, Bank Of Maharashtra, Yadav Bhawan, Bus Stand, Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur. 3. Shri Ruhi Gaur, Manager Bank of Maharashtra, Yadav Bhawan Bus Stand, Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Sharma and Mr. Yashvardhan Singh Shekhawat for Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Himanshu Tholia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/01/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of ex parte interim order dated 08.02.2018, whereby respondents were restrained to appoint any other person on contract basis for the Branch, where the petitioner was working. [2026:RJ-JP:3884] (2 of 2) [CCP-341/2023] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in utter defiance of order dated 08.02.2018, one order dated 01.09.2022 was issued by the placement agency, whereby one Shri Rahul Sain Son of Shri Bheru Lal Sain, was appointed as housekeeper in place of petitioner at Bank of Maharashtra, Manoharpur Branch. 3. Reply to the contempt petition has been filed in which it has been stated that order dated 01.09.2022 was issued by the placement agency and thereafter, on the very next day, one order dated 02.09.2022 was issued, revealing therein that the order dated 01.09.2022 was issued inadvertently by the placement agency and such order has been withdrawn. 4. In the light of above statement in the reply, supported by letter dated 02.09.2022 (annex.-R/3), no case of deliberate and wilful disobedience is made out. Hence, the instant contempt petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed. 5. Notice stands discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /26