Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17065 (BOM)

SWAMI KRUPA DEVELOPERS THROUGH SUNIL VASANT CHAWANDE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

IA/147/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DTG /TSB 11-Ia-147-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4222 OF 2023 Swami Krupa Developers … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________ Adv. Tej Singh a/w Adv. Jaiprarkash Rajbhar and Adv. Prived Malushte for Applicant in Ist Session. None for Applicant in IInd Session. Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 5th October 2026 P.C. : 1) By a praecipe dated 27th September 2026, learned Advocate for the Applicant sought urgent circulation to seek an order of restoration of the Petition. 2) During the course of hearing, upon perusal of the record and particularly the prayers sought in the Petition, we drew attention of learned Advocate for the Applicant to the recent Supreme Court judgment in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2026 SCC 1/2 DTG /TSB 11-Ia-147-2026.doc OnLine SC 798 and asked him to consider the same before seeking restoration of the Petition. 3) At his request, the matter was kept back, to be called out in the second session. 4) In the second session, when the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the Applicant. 5) It appears that, the Applicant is not interested in pursuing the Application in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar (supra). 6) Accordingly, Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2 DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Digitally signed by DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR Date: 2026.10.08 15:54:08 +0530