Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17064 (CHH)

JEEVAN DAS JOGI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/738/2025 · 2026-02-18

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 738 of 2025 1 - Jeevan Das Jogi S/o Sadan Lal Jogi Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Jaroud, Tahsil Simga, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Devcharan Sahu S/o Ram Bharos Sahu Aged About 75 Years R/o Village- Jaroud, Tahsil Simga, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Energy Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, Energy Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Simga District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 5 - Orissa Generation Phase-Ii Transmission Ltd., (Ogptl), Through- Executive Engineer House No.1/03, Phase Ii, Surya Vihar, Junwani Road, Bhilai (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) {Cause title, as taken from CIS} 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 For Respondent No. 5 : : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate. {Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi} Order on Board 19/02/2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that proceeding is already pending before Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara for redressal of grievance of the petitioners, therefore, they do not want to pursue instant petition, hence, he prays that they may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue their case before Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Simga, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara. 2. Counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners. 3. On due consideration, the same is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty as aforesaid. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. No cost (s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.02.24 18:36:11 +0530 3