Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17061 (RAJ)

STAYTING STAYTS (O.P.C.) PRIVATE LIMITED v. SMT PREM AGARWAL W/O SH. PRAKASH AGARWAL

CW/2848/2026 · 2026-02-12

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2848/2026 1. Stayting Stayts (O.P.C.) Private Limited, Through Director Shree Shashi Sharma Son Of Shri Shanti Prakash Sharma (A) Resident Of House Number D-174 Malviya Nagar, Jaipur And (B) Resident Of Jalebi Chowk Village Bhumawada Tehsil Laxamangarh, District Sikar. 2. Shashi Sharma Son Of Sri Shanti Prakash Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, (A) Resident Of House Number D-174 Malviya Nagar, Jaipur And (B) Resident Of Jalebi Chowk Village Bhumawada Tehsil Laxamangarh, District Sikar. ----Petitioners-Respondents Versus Smt Prem Agarwal W/o Sh. Prakash Agarwal, Through Power Of Attorney Sonu Agarwal, S/o Sh. Prakash Agarwal, R/o Near Jama Masjid, Gangapur City At Present R/o Flat No. 301, J K D Pearl, Stylom Apartment Mahaveer Nagar, Near Ram Mandir, Durgapura, Jaipur, Pin Code- 302018 ----Respondent/Applicant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma Mr. Ajay Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 12/02/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 03.02.2026, passed by learned Rent Tribunal No.1, Additional Senior Civil Judge cum Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitian I, Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 11 Rule 12 CPC has been rejected. [2026:RJ-JP:6720] (2 of 2) [CW-2848/2026] 2. Without pressing the writ petitions on merit, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide the impugned order his right to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witness PW-1 has also been closed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made an innocuous prayer that they may be given one opportunity to cross-examine PW-1. 4. Considering the same, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners are granted one opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witness on the date as may be fixed by the learned Trial Court. 5. If the respondents are aggrieved by this order in any manner then they are at liberty to file an application for recalling of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J JUBIN /14