Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17061 (AP)

POLA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3699/2023 · 2026-01-07

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010074942023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3699/2023 Between: 1. POLA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE POLA VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O H.NO.1-136, PETA VEEDI, KANALA VILLAGE, SANJAMALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KANALA PANCHAYAT, SANJAMALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE PRESIDENT, KANALA PANCHAYAT, SANJAMALA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more Particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's Trust property an extent of Ac.0.01 cent, situated in Sy.No.278/2, D.No.1-136/A, Kanala Village, Sanjamala Mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law and trying to evict the petitioner from the petitioner's Trust property is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner's Trust property an extent of Ac.0-01 cent, situated in Sy.No.278/2, D.No.1-136/A, Kanala Village, Sanjamala Mandal, Kurnool District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner's Trust property an extent of Ac.0- 01 cent, situated in Sy.No.278/2, D.No.1-136/A, Kanala Village, Sanjamala Mandal, Kurnool District and not to evict the petitioner from his property, Pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASU L Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ORDER: On 06.11.2025 and 04.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. On 18.12.2025 also, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 08th January, 2026 JLV 300 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3699/2023 Date: 08th January, 2026 JLV