MANORANJAN CHOUDHURY v. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/1286/2022 · 2026-01-04
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17055 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17055 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010030322022
2026:GAU-AS:42
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1286/2022 MANORANJAN CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE RAMANANDA CHOUDHURY, R/O- 2 NO. GORESWAR, P.O. AND P.S. GORESWAR, DIST. BAKSA, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 781366. VERSUS THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, STATION ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001.
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD. 101-105 1ST FLOOR B WING SHIV CHAMBERS SECTOR-II C.B.D. BELAPUR NAVI MUMBAI-400614.
3:THE BRANCH MANAGER SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
3RD FLOOR MEGHMALLER APARTMENT NEAR CENTRAL NURSING HOME SURVEY BELTOLA GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781028 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R DHAR, MR B C MUCHAHARY Advocate for the Respondent : MR H BARUAH (r-2), MR P P PHUKAN (r-2),MR P BORAH (r-2)
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/1285/2022 MANORANJAN CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE RAMANANDA CHOUDHURY R/O- 2 NO. GORESWAR P.O. AND P.S. GORESWAR DIST. BAKSA BTR ASSAM PIN- 781366. VERSUS THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS REP. BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATION ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001.
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD. 101-105 1ST FLOOR B WING SHIV CHAMBERS SECTOR-II C.B.D. BELAPUR NAVI MUMBAI-400614.
3:THE BRANCH MANAGER SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
3RD FLOOR MEGHMALLER APARTMENT NEAR CENTRAL NURSING HOME SURVEY BELTOLA GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781028. ------------ Advocate for : MR R DHAR Advocate for : MR. P P DAS (r-3) appearing for THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05.01.2026
Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, have submitted that the matters have become infructuous.
Accordingly, writ petitions stand closed as having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant