APHC010073992024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1821/2024 Between: 1. GODDUMURI VENKATESWARLU, S/O OBULESHU, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS, SEC CHAIRMAN, R/O DOOR NO 1-121, KONUTHURU VILLAGE-515672, MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRI GOPAL KRISHAN DWIVEDI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI P ARUN BABU I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - CUM - DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PUTAPARTHI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-515134. 3. UPPARA MEENAKSHI, THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT PUTAPARTHI, ANDHRA PRADESH -515134. 4. P RAJESWARI DEVI, THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. G SUVARNA, THE GRAMA PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, DHARMAVARAM KUNUTHURU VILLAGE-515672, REP BY ITS MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of court Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court dated 24.04.2023 in WP No. 10276/2023, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued by this Hon'ble court dated on 31.01.2026 in C.C.No. 1821 of 2024 against this Petitioner/ Contemnor No.5 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition, on which the Contempt Case is filed, itself has been closed. In that view of the matter, it would be appropriate to close the Contempt Case also. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 07.03.2026 MJA 28 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1821/2024 07.03.2026 MJA