APHC010076132026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4764/2026 Between: 1. BOYA RANGAMMA, W/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT 47YRS R/O KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 2. NALLABOTHULA MUNEMMA, W/O VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 45YRS, R/O H.NO.5/43, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 3. PADMA, W/O VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 47YRS R/O H.NO.5-38, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 4. BOYA NAGESHWARAMMA, W/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YRS R/O H.NO.5-154, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 5. KUNCHAPU LAKSHMIDEVI, W/O KUNCHAPU YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YRS R/O H.NO.15-293, MARUTHI NAGAR , VTC, NANDIKOTKUR KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518401 6. BOYA LAKSHMI, W/O BOYA LINGANNA AGED ABOUT 63YRS RIO KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 7. LINGAYATH ANASUYAMMA, W/O LINGAYATH MALLIKARJUNA GOUD AGED ABOUT 71 YRS R/O H.NO.5/125, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 8. SIVAMMA, D/O GANGAVARA BASAVANNA GOUD AGED ABOUT 60YRS RIO KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 9. MEKALA PARVATHAMMA, W/O MEKALA OMKAR AGED ABOUT 66YRS R/O H.NO.5/36, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 10. BOYA MUNEMMA, W/O LINGANNA AGED ABOUT 74YRS RIO H.NO.5-2, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 2 11. VADDE LAKSHMI, W/O VADDE HANUMANTHU AGED ABOUT 53YRS RIO H.NO.5/77, KANAKAVEEDU PETA, NANDAVARAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT -518343 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT -518002 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518301 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDAVARAM MANDAL -518313 KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 in interfering with the petitioners' house sites situated in Plot Nos. 54, 143, 4, 163, 98, 94, 126, 6, 69, 10 and 96 in Sy.No.165/1 of Kanakaveedu village, Nandavaram mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law as arbitrary, S illegal, highhanded and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the petitioners house sites situated in Plot Nos. 54, 143, 4, 163, 98, 94, 126, 6, 69, 10 and 96 in Sy.No.165/1 of Kanakaveedu village, Nandavaram mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the petitioners' house sites situated in Plot Nos. 54, 143, 4, 163, 98, 94, 126, 6, 69, 10 and 96 in Sy.No.16511 of Kanakaveedu village, Nandavaram mandal, Kurnool District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent in interfering with the petitioner’s house sties situated in Plot Nos.54, 143, 4, 163, 98, 94, 126, 6, 69, 10 and 96 in Sy.No.165/1 of Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 09.03.2026 submits that the Plot Nos.54, 143, 4, 163, 98, 94, 126, 6, 69, 10 and 96 in Sy.No.165/1 of Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Kurnool District are allotted and issued house site pattas to the petitioners. However, the entire layout area is vacant and fallow. The beneficiaries including the petitioners, did not take physical possession of the plots, and no constructions have been undertaken. The appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law after obtaining necessary orders from the competent authority. A detailed report will be submitted to the 3rd respondent for seeking suitable orders and further action if any will be taken only thereafter in accordance with law. There has been no illegal interference on the part of the 4th respondent. The 4 petitioners are not in physical possession of the subject plots and no adverse or coercive action has been taken against them. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject plots strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose. The petitioners shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law if they are otherwise found to be in possession of the same by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject plots, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. Any dispossession shall not be made from the subject plots except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 09.03.2026 shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 10.03.2026 NNN