Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010203942018 2026:GAU-AS:4033 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/10/2019 1. DHANANJAY ROY AND 6 ORS S/O LATE DHANESWAR ROY SARKAR (BABU) R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 2: NILAKHI ROY D/O DHANESWAR ROY SARKAR (BABU) R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 3: SMT. BIMALA SARKAR W/O LT. DHARMA NARYAN SARKAR R/O VILL. CHITILA P.O. CHITILA DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTAD PIN 4: SMTI PROMILA ROY SARKAR W/O SRI KHOGEN ROY (MONDAL) R/O VILL. CHITILA P.O. CHITILA DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTAD Page No.# 2/4 PIN 5: MONESWAR ROY SARKAR S/O LT. DHARMA NARYAN SARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 6: SMTI MAMONI ROY D/O LT. DHARMA NARYAN SARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 7: SMT. MONJULA ROY D/O LT. DHARMA NARYAN SARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 VERSUS 1. SMT PRITIKONA GHOSH (SARKAR) AND2 ORS W/O LATE HIRU VENGSARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 2:KUMAR BIRJYA ARAJUN VENGSARKAR D/O LATE HIRU VENGSARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) Page No.# 3/4 DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 3:KUMARI GARRGGI VENGSARKAR D/O LATE HIRU VENGSARKAR R/O WARD NO. 15 R.K. MISSION ROAD (SANKARDEV BYE LANE) DHUBRI P.O. BIDYAPARA P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783324 ------------ Advocate for : MR. S K GHOSH Advocate for : MR. K BHATTACHARJEE (R1-R3) appearing for SMT PRITIKONA GHOSH (SARKAR) AND2 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 20.03.2026 Heard Mr. S.K. Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the order passed in the connected CRP No. 142/2018, setting aside the impugned judgment and decree and remanding the matter to the learned First Appellate Court, the instant regular second appeal has become Page No.# 4/4 infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as such. However, it is made clear that, pursuant to the remand, after the appeal is decided, it would be open for the parties to avail of remedies provided by law, including by way of regular second appeal. The appeal stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant