Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1705 (AP)

MS INFRA REP BY MANAGING PARTNER v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9948/2026 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010177772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9948/2026 Between: 1. MS INFRA REP BY MANAGING PARTNER, D.SRIKANTH REDDY S/O D. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC CONTRACTOR, DOOR NO 1-3-M9-11 CHENNAREDDY COLONY, NEAR MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE PULIVENDULUA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS , PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DRISTRICT.522 238. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP, BY ITS , PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DRISTRICT.522 238. 3. THE A P STATE EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, CORPORATION APEWIDC REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE TADEPALLI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT.522 501 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, A P STATE EDUCATION WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APEWIDC,KADAPA, YSR KADPA,DISTRICT.516 001 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A P STATE EDUCATION WELFARE 2 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION APEWIDC ,KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 516 001 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT.516 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted final bills to the petitioner for the work pertaining to construction of new School Building at ZP High School at Kovaguntapalli village of Simahdripuram Mandal in YSR Kadapa District., for an amount of Rs. 47,65,083/-even after the entries were recorded in M-Book is illegal, arbitrary, malafide, high-handed, and contrary to the procedure established by law apart from being voilative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to release the admitted final bill amounts of Rs. 47,65,083/-along with interest forthwith in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the admitted final bill amounts to the petitioner for the work pertaining construction of new School Building at ZP High School at Kovaguntapalli village of Simahdripuram Mandal in YSR Kadapa District.for amount of Rs. 47,65,083/-pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAVULURU KRISHNA SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in releasing the bills due payable to the petitioner on account of construction of new school building at Z.P.High School, Kovaguntapalli Village in Simhadripuram Mandal in YSR Kadapa District. 2. The petitioner has completed the work entrusted to the satisfaction of the respondents and the progress of work and completion of work is also recorded in the M-Book. 3. Sri V.CH.Naidu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5 submits that the work is completed and the bills were also been processed. The 6th respondent would have to release the funds and the bills shall be uploaded in the NIDHI portal soon after release of funds by the 6th respondent. 4. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5, it is not in dispute that the work is completed and the bill is also due payable. Respondent Nos.3 to 5 have submitted the copy of the correspondence from the 5th respondent to the Pay and Accounts Officer, Kadapa, dated 16.04.2026 indicating the total claim amount of Rs.47,65,083/- and a deduction of Rs.5,23,928/- thereby an amount of Rs.42,41,155/- as due payable to the petitioner. 4 5. Considering the same, the Writ Petition is disposed off, directing the respondents to release the payment due payable to the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 17.04.2026 SR