[2026:JHHC:17731] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1963 of 2026 Sushil Soren, Aged about 25 years, S/O- Ganesh Soren, R/O- Dhanvasha, P.O- Mandro, P.S- Mirzachowki, District- Sahibganj. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B. Shastri, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 18.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mirzachowki P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 69, 77, 303(2) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that initially the complaint case was lodged and thereafter by the order of the learned court, the FIR has been instituted. He further submits that when the police has gone to record the statement of the victim, she has refused to give the statement and she has also denied to return to her house and the victim is residing in the State of Himanchal Pradesh and that has come in paras-13 and 19 of the case diary. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations of establishing the relationship was there in the complaint case. [2026:JHHC:17731] -2- 5. It has come in the FIR itself that two years prior of lodging of the complaint, the relationship was established and the complaint case has been lodged on 08.09.2025, which was later on converted in the FIR by the order of the learned court and after institution of the FIR, the police has tried to record the statement of the victim, however, she has refused to depose anything and she has also refused to return to the house, as the victim is residing in the State of Himanchal Pradesh and that has come in paras-13 and 19 of the case diary. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj, in connection with Mirzachowki P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-18.06.2026 Amitesh/-