901-WP-11881-2026 (AS).doc Ashwini IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11881 OF 2026 Madhuri Savliram Gunjal alias Madhuri Dandekar ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Medical Council through Registrar & Anr. ...Respondents ... Adv. Saurabh Ghag, a/w Adv. Dakshata Sawant, Adv. Nikita Chavan, Adv. Siddhant Raul, Adv. Sanghpriya Sarode and Adv. Monali Gadhave for the Petitioner. Adv. Brijesh Rathod for Respondent No.1. Adv. Pravin Gaikwad, a/w Adv. Angelina B. C., i/by Adv. Ganesh Dalvi for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ashish Sawant, Respondent No.2, in-person, present. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the parties and Mr. Ashish Sawant, i.e. Respondent No.2, who is present in Court acknowledge the Consent Terms and its execution dated 24th September 2026, which are already on record. 1/3 ASHWINI PRASAD NARHIRE Digitally signed by ASHWINI PRASAD NARHIRE Date: 2026.10.09 10:57:42 +0530 901-WP-11881-2026 (AS).doc 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view of the Consent Terms dated 24th September 2026, the Petitioner has already withdrawn the complaints lodged against the Respondent No.2. 4. In order to facilitate the parties and give a quietus to the issue in hand, we had adjourned the matter on 5th October 2026, in order to enable the learned counsel for Respondent No.1, i.e Maharashtra Medical Council, to obtain proper instructions with regard to the restoration of Petitioner’s registration as a Medical Practitioner, in light of the said Consent Terms dated 24th September 2026. Today, on instructions, he submits that Respondent No.1 is inclined to pass an appropriate order in terms of the Consent Terms dated 24th September 2026, in case some breathing time is accorded to them. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, we find that the parties have already settled the matter in terms of the Consent Terms dated 24th September 2026. Accordingly, the Respondent No.1 may pass an appropriate order on the issue of restoration of Petitioner’s registration as a Medical Practitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of this order. 6. We clarify that this Court has not adverted to the merits of the matter. 2/3 901-WP-11881-2026 (AS).doc 7. Accordingly, with the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is Disposed Of. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 3/3