Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
On 24.04.2026, this Court had passed the following order:
“Learned counsel submits that there is neither any injury nor any overt act attributed to the petitioner and it is a case of version and cross-version, for which, reference is made to Annexure P-2. He is not involved in any other ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate.
Notice of motion.
At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent
Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 01.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of as enshrined under Section 482 (2) BNSS.
, this Court had passed the following order:-
Learned counsel submits that there is neither any injury nor overt act attributed to the petitioner and it is a case of for which, reference is made to
2. He is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when the investigating agency and will cooperate. At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG behalf of respondent-State.
Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the before 01.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 482 (2) BNSS.
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.12 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.
However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated.
Adjourned to 12.05.2026.”
3.
Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.
4.
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Kashmir Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation.
5.
In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 24.04.2026 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
6.
However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.
PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.12 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.