Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17042 (CHH)

DAYASHANKAR RAJAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/623/2026 · 2026-02-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9298 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 623 of 2026 Dayashankar Rajak S/o Dayaram Rajak Aged About 32 Years R/o Bajrang Ward, Bhatapara, Thana- Bhatapara City, District : Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- S H O, Thana- Bhatapara City, District : Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Samir Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 23/02/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.398/2025 registered at Police Station Bhatapara City, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for the GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.02.25 10:54:41 +0530 2 offence punishable under Sections 314, 317(2), 317(4), 61(2)(A), 112 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita & 66 (C), 66 (D) of Information Technology Act, 2000. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that complainant namely Vinod Singh has lodged the written report that in different bank account illegal money of about Rs. 49,999/- has been received. It has been fount that illegal money has been earned in the above bank account and the amount of fraud has been received by using the bank account which is active in Bhatapara city area. Complaints have been found registered in relation to these bank account in the National Cyber Crime reporting portal of the different police stations of India. The above bank account holder was found to have earned illegal money by committing cyber fraud by making criminal conspiracy in a well planned manner. The co-accused Wasim has given Rs. 2,000/-for this work and operated the said bank account. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent 32 years old villager and he is not involved in the alleged offence but due to some doubt police has arrested the applicant in the alleged commission of offence. He would submit that the applicant having no concern with the said bank account and there is no any connection of the said crime. He would submit that charge sheet has been filed, the applicant is in jail since 14/07/2025 and conclusion of trial will take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. 3 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and she would submit that in compliance of the Courts order dated 19/01/2026 the Investigating Officer has filed his personal affidavit wherein at para 7 of the affidavit it has been stated that during investigation, it was revealed that, a total amount of Rs. 15,59,737/- has been credited into the aforesaid Indian Overseas Bank, Bhatapara Branch Account Number 296101000015137 of the present accused applicant Dayashankar Rajak within a short span of time period and an amount of Rs. 15,58,369/- has been debited by the accused persons. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the fact that a total amount of Rs.15,59,737/- has been credited into the Account Number 296101000015137 of the present applicant at Indian Overseas Bank, Bhatapara Branch within a short span of time period and an amount of Rs.15,58,369/- has been debited by the accused persons, thereby it is evident that the applicant was involved in organized crime and the modus operandi reflects a well-orchestrated and large-scale financial fraud committed through digital platforms, causing substantial monetary loss and public harm, thus involvement of the applicant in the alleged offence appears to be reasonable and such incidents are increasing rapidly, severely impacting not only the 4 economy but also the banking system, hence, this Court does not find it to be a fit case to release the applicant on regular bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application of applicant Dayashankar Rajak involved in Crime No.398/2025 registered at Police Station Bhatapara City, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 314, 317(2), 317(4), 61(2)(A), 112 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita & 66 (C), 66 (D) of Information Technology Act, 2000, is rejected. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE gouri