NARAYANA v. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
WA/2075/2025 · 2026-02-21
D K Singh, S Rachaiah
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1704 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1704 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10814-DB WA No. 2075 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO.2075 OF 2025 (S-DIS) BETWEEN: NARAYANA S/O. DATTATREYA GHATAGE AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS OCC. NIL R/O. SIDDESHWAR NAGAR APMC ROAD AFZALPUR TALUK KALABURAGI-585 301 …APPELLANT (BY SRI CHRISTOPHER NOEL A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE HAJI COLONY RAICHUR-584 101 Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10814-DB WA No. 2075 of 2025
2. THE A.D.M. SHERISTEDAR DISTRICT COURT HAJI COLONY RAICHUR-584 101 …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.06.2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.225866 OF 2020 (S-DIS) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT AND TO CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10814-DB WA No. 2075 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra-court appeal has been filed by the appellant/petitioner impugning the judgment and order dated 28.06.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.225866/2020, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner/appellant challenging the order dated 30.04.2020 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Raichur, terminating the petitioner’s probation, came to be dismissed.
2. During the probation, the petitioner was given a warning. However, despite the warning, he did not change his attitude/behaviour. Finding that there is no scope for improvement in his conduct, the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Raichur, has terminated the probation of the petitioner.
3. Having considered the impugned judgment, we do not find any scope for interference by this Court in the present intra-court appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the writ appeal. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1