Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7904 MFA No. 6310 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6310 OF 2021 (CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI B S NANDA KUMAR S/O B SHIVARAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.47, 2ND B MAIN ROAD, 2ND COSS, SRIGANDHANAGARA HEGGANAHALLI, NEAR KTG COLLEGE VISHWANEEDAM HOBLI, BENGALURU-560091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GOPI N., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SRI K PRASANNA S/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO. 132, 3RD MAIN ROAD, HVR LAYOUT HOUSING BOARD COLONY MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560079. …RESPONDENT
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(c) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7904 MFA No. 6310 of 2021
ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing.
2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 05.02.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 10.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the appellant on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution.
3 As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46