Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17031 (RAJ)

LALARAM S/O TIKAMSINGH v. GRAM PANCHAYAT TUHIYA PANCHAYAT SAMITI

CW/2697/2026 · 2026-02-11

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6331] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2697/2026 Lalaram S/o Tikamsingh, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Uwaar Tehsile Kumher District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Gram Panchayat Tuhiya Panchayat Samiti, Sewar, District Bharatpur Through Sarpanch. 2. Harkishan S/o Fakirchand, R/o Ranjeet Nagar Bharatpur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 11/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mohit Gupta, at the very outset, has limited his submissions to the extent of seeking issuance of directions to the learned Board of Revenue to decide the appeal being Appeal/LR/1589/2015/Bharatpur, which is pending since year 2015, in a time bound manner. Learned counsel submits that the said appeal has been filed by the respondents against the order dated 26.02.2015, passed by Revenue Appellate Authority (RAA), Bharatpur and the learned Board of Revenue vide its interim order dated 16.04.2015 has stayed the effect and operation of the order dated 26.02.2015. 2. Learned counsel further submits that appeal before the RAA was filed against the order dated 31.05.2002, passed by District Collector, Bharatpur, with respect to land bearing Khasra No.225 [2026:RJ-JP:6331] (2 of 2) [CW-2697/2026] admeasuring 0.30 hectare, Gram Panchayat Tuhiya, Panchayat Samiti Sewar, District Bharatpur. 3. Taking note of the limited submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and also the fact that the appeal is pending before learned Board of Revenue since year 2015, the genesis of which is the order passed way back in the year 2002 passed by District Collector, Bharatpur, without delving into the merits of the matter, it would be in the fitness of things to request learned Board of Revenue to decide the said appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. As this order has been passed without issuing notices to the respondents, learned Board of Revenue shall ensure that the copy of this order is also served upon all the parties and only thereafter, proceedings in the said appeal be carried out after granting opportunity of hearing to the parties. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /01