SAJID ALIAHMAD SHAIKH v. ICICI HOME FINANCE LTD AND ANR
WP/1182/2026 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17031 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17031 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14-WP-1182-2026(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1182 OF 2026 Sajid Aliahmad Shaikh ...Petitioner Versus ICICI Home Finance Ltd And Another ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3433 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1182 OF 2026 Aishwarya Tanaji Dhende ...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Sajid Aliahmad Shaikh ...Petitioner Versus ICICI Home Finance Ltd And Another ...Respondents —————— None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. Mr. Shubham dhenge a/w Mr. Siddhesh Kadam for the intervenor. ——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2026.
P. C. :
1. The present Petition challenges the physical possession order dated 30th January 2026, passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation Jamadar - SL 1 of
2 2026:BHC-KOL:9780-DB
14-WP-1182-2026(C).doc and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”).
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the auction purchaser submits that the possession was taken over and thereafter the borrowers have forcibly trespassed into the subject property, for which a separate Writ Petition has been filed.
3. The Petitioner has an alternate remedy under the SARFAESI Act and as the order is already implemented, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. The Petition stands dismissed.
4. Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands
disposed of.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Jamadar - SL 2 of
2