[2026:RJ-JP:6342] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2443/2026 Murari Lal Saini S/o Brajmohan Saini, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Ganesh Colony, Behind Navjivan Hospital, Lalsot, Dausa. (Presently Confined In Jaipur Central Jail). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2553/2026 Ravi Meena S/o Kedar Prasad Meena, R/o Village Nagariyawas, Post Lalpura, Shrisukhchainpura, Lalsot, Dausa. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Joshi, Mr. Vikas Gurjar, Ms. Nikita Meena, for Mr. Deepak Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 11/02/2026 1. These second bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No. 187/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station Commissionerate Jaipur, District Deputy Commissioner for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), [2026:RJ-JP:6342] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2443/2026] 316(2), 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and under Sections 43 and 66 of I.T. Act, 2008. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are triable by the learned Magistrate. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody from the date of arrest. Counsel also submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, and there is no any other criminal case pending against the accused-petitioners, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. 5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and the allegations made against the accused-petitioners and more particularly the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are trialable by the learned Magistrate, so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and accused-petitioners are in custody from the date of arrest, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:6342] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2443/2026] 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /2,3