[2026:RJ-JP:965] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2400/2025 Kunal Sharma S/o Shri Sanjeev Sharma, Aged About 21 Years, R/o A-319, Shyam Sarovar, Jirota Kalyan, Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.278/2022 registered with the Police Station, Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 323, 341, 356, 384 & 143 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of interrogation report of co-accused, Bharat Lal Meena. She also submits that though the interrogation report of co-accused cannot be read against the petitioner, however, even in the interrogation note, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. She also submits that the petitioner is always ready to cooperate with the investigation. She also submits that not even a [2026:RJ-JP:965] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2400/2025] single penny has been transferred in the account of the present petitioner. She also submits that the petitioner has already made a representation through his lawyer for transfer of investigation as the Investigating Officer is not impartial. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application and submits that the allegations against the accused-petitioner are of serious and grave in nature. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers. 5. On perusal of the contents of the F.I.R., it is borne out that the accused petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated as an accused on the basis of interrogation note of co-accused Bharat Lal Meena. On perusal of the interrogation note of Bharat Lal Meena, it is revealed that no specific overt act has been assigned to the present petitioner. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) in F.I.R. No. 278/2022 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he [2026:RJ-JP:965] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2400/2025] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /246