Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17022 (JHR)

SANJEEV MISHRA @ SANJIV MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5452/2026 · 2026-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:17720] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5452 of 2026 ------ Sanjeev Mishra @ Sanjiv Mishra, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Hari Shankar Mishra, resident of Gandhinagar Bagbera Near Railway High School, P.O. & P.S.- Bagbera, District- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chakulia P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309 (6) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery from the jewellery shop and looted gold jewellery and money from the said shop. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on Test Identification Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted against him and he has been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that charge has also been framed against the petitioner. It is also submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.11.2025 as has been mentioned para- 15 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Ghatshila in connection with Chakulia P.S. Case No.44 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-18.06.2026-Animesh/