Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1702 (JHR)

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Acq. App.(C)/14/2021 · 2026-02-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:2584 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal (C) No. 14 of 2021 ------ Union of India, through Anil Kumar Singh, Inspector In- Charge, RPF/POST/Eastern Railway, Bhagalpur, aged about 51 years, s/o late Suraj Deo Singh, Village-Katiknar P.O.- Katiknar, P.S.-Nawangar, Dist.-Buxar, Bihar .... .... …. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Wakil Yadav, aged about 43 years, s/o Bhagli Yadav, Village-Amgoehi, P.O.+P.S.-Poraiya Hat, Dist.-Godda 3. Avinash Yadav, aged about 46 years, s/o late Nageshwar Yadav, Village-Dropad, P.O.-Dropad, P.S.-Poraiya Hat, Dist.- Godda 4. Suresh Yadav, aged about 49 years, s/o Bhagli Yadav, Village-Amgoehi, P.O.+P.S.-Poraiya Hat, Dist.-Godda 5. Md. Islamuddin, aged about 51 years, s/o Yakub Miyan, Village-Panda Patham, P.O.+P.S.-Poraiya Hat, Dist.-Godda .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : Ms. Nitu Singh, CGC For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. For the Resp. Nos. 2 to 5 : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate ------ Order No.09 Dated- 02.02.2026 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this acquittal appeal with liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned Sessions Judge. Learned counsel for the respondents have no serious objection. This acquittal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In view of the withdrawal of this acquittal appeal, interlocutory application no. 3493 of 2024 is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 02.02.2026 Sonu/Gunjan-