2026:JHHC:17933 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5115 of 2026 Tetra Oraon, son of late Somra Oraon. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, APP --- 02/19.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2026 in connection with Bishunpur P.S. Case No.06/2026, registered under Sections 103 (2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gumla. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and it is alleged that one mentally disturbed/unbalanced woman was found in the garden of the petitioner and when the petitioner raised alarm, numbers of persons gathered and she was assaulted and ultimately, she succumbed injuries. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation and there is nothing against the petitioner. He submits that the co – accused namely Bishwa Oraon and Chandreshwar Oraon have been enlarged on bail in B.A. No.4172 of 2026 and another co-accused namely Shiblal Oraon has been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 4941 of 2026. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and upon going through the impugned order itself, it is apparent that on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner, the name of the co- accused had transpired and blood stained rope and danda used while committing the offence was recovered from the petitioner upon his 2026:JHHC:17933 2 disclosure. 6. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is of the considered view that the case of the petitioner is not similar to that of the other co- accused persons, accordingly, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:19.06.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:19.06.2026