( 2026:JHHC:17661) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5438 of 2026 ------ 1. Sheikh Kudus, aged about 47 years, Son of – Late Sheikh Jasmuddin Ansari 2. Sheikh Khurshid, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Sheikh Jasmuddin Ansari 3. Sheikh Khustar, aged about 21 years, Son of – Sheikh Tasaur Ansari @ Shri Sheikh Tasaur Ansari All Resident of Village- Gudi, P.O. and P.S.- Garhwa, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P.P. Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Chanchal Chhaya, Advocate Mr. Apurv Krishna, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Garhwa (Town) P.S. Case No. 219 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 351(2), 352, 115(2), 126(2), 117(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners attempted to murder the members of the informant party, namely, Sheikh Manauwar, Sheikh Sajid, Sheikh Tausif and Sheikh Imran and caused injuries to them. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there is no allegation of assault by any sharp cutting weapon or any firearm. It is next submitted that the dispute between the parties is a petty dispute. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in jail custody since 01.04.2026, as mentioned in para 16 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioners may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa (Town) P.S. Case No. 219 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.06.2026 Vedanti/