Chintada Krishna Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/4058/2024 · 2026-02-01
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17014 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17014 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010073692024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4058 of 2024 Between:
1. CHINTADA KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O. CHINTADA VENKATA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.2-18, VAMSADHARA COLONY, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY ROADS AND BUILDINGS (RANDB) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (RANDB) SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, RANDB CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (R AND B), (R AND B) DIVISION, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing total payment of Rs. 36,57,523/- vide M. Book No. 2179 A, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., (1) Urgent repairs to Dola-Polaki- Nowpada road from Km 10/0 to 24/0 in Srikakulam District, vide Agreement dated 27-01-2023, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 36,57,523/- for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and pass order or orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant Leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in WP.No.4058 of 2024. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
Order:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: …… to declare declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing total payment of Rs. 36,57,523/- vide M. Book No. 2179 A, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., (1) Urgent repairs to Dola-Polaki-Nowpada road from Km 10/0 to 24/0 in Srikakulam District, vide Agreement dated 27-01- 2023, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 36,57,523/- for the pending final bills forthwith for the above said works executed by the petitioner and pass order or orders. 2. The 5th respondent has filed the counter stating that the final amount of Rs.39,61,079/- was passed on 28.04.2023 and uploaded in NIDHI portal vide bill no.2025-9098059 (SAP no.2025-1105276). Further it is submitted that the above bill is pending with the 2nd respondent (Finance Department) for fund clearance. 3. The respondents have admitted in the written instructions that the petitioner has executed the work entrusted to him. In the present case, the respondents have not disputed the payment due to the petitioner for the work executed and the respondents have manifested in their written instructions/counter that they will pay the amount to the petitioner and they are unable to the pay due to “Bill waiting for fund clearance”, once the work executed by the petitioner to the respondents is admitted and the payment
due to the petitioner is not disputed by the respondents, there was hardly no need for this Court to refer the matter to any forum or for arbitration for passing an arbitral award assuming that any condition in the agreement to that extent. Hence, this Court directs the respondents to pay the admitted amount to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with following directions: (a) The respondents are directed to clear the due amount to the petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (b) Sum due to the petitioner would mean, the sum arrived after statutory deductions. If there is any dispute regarding statutory recoveries, the petitioner is at liberty to communicate/interface with the respondents.
(c) With regard to interest, the petitioner is at liberty to approach appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO, J Date:02.02.2026
JAK
96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 4058 of 2024
Date:02.02.2026
JAK
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: W.P. No. 4058 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
05.
02.02.2026 TRR, J I.A. No. 01 of 2025 Leave Granted. W.P. No. 4058 of 2024 The present writ petition is disposed of. (Vide Separate Order)
______ TRR, J JAK