[2026:RJ-JP:6788] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 232/2026 1. Suman D/o Shri Harphool Gurjar, Wife Of Shri Golu Singh Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Sapura Amli, District Tonk (Rajasthan), At Present Residing At Jaisinghpura, Khandar District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 2. Golu Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Mohan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Jaisinghpura Gothra, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. District Superintendent Of Police, Tonk (Rajasthan) 3. S.h.o. Police Station Soap, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 4. Harphool Gurjar S/o Shri Ghasilal Gurjar, Resident Of Village Sapura Amli, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 5. Murlilal Gurjar S/o Shri Ghasilal Gurjar, Resident Of Village Sapura Amli, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 6. Amar Chand S/o Shri Ghasilal Gurjar, Resident Of Village Sapura Amli, District Tonk (Rajasthan) 7. Sugreev S/o Shri Balaram, Resident Of Village Nayagaon, Police Station Khatoli, District Kota Rural (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assistant G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 12/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 4 to 7 as they are [2026:RJ-JP:6788] (2 of 3) [CRLW-232/2026] apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 31.01.2026 at Arya Samaj Temple, Delhi according to Hindu Rituals and petitioners have also executed an agreement of marriage. A copy of agreement along-with original photographs of their marriage have been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 4 to 7 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:6788] (3 of 3) [CRLW-232/2026] 9. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/168