APHC010072972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 461/2025 Between: 1. N VENKANNA, S/O N DEVAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O DNO 1135, BOBBARLANKA (V), ATREYAPURAM (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DIST 2. SRI SRI G SRINIVAS RAO, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, GODAVARI HEAD WORKS DIVISION, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLAISWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SRI KASI VISVESWARA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI HEAD WORKS DIVISION, DOWLAISWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempt of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 3649/2023 dated 06.11.2023 by His Lordship Sri Justice VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T S RAYALU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case. Learned counsel for the respondents also accepted the same. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 29.01.2026 M K K 270 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Contempt Case No.461 of 2025 Date: 29.01.2026 M K K