1 2026:CGHC:7900 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 10 of 2026 1 - Sanjiv Choudhari S/o Jagdish Choudhary Aged About 46 Years House No. 06 Gandhi Nagar, Dixit Colony, Kosa Nagar, Bhilai, Durg C.G. (Guarantor And Partner Of M/s Kaiser Infra (Partnership Firm) Plot No. 14 Block 34 Nehru Nagar (West), Bhilai, Durg, C.G.). 2 - Deepti Mahajan W/o Lt. N.K. Mahajan Aged About 50 Years Plot No. 35 Phase 2 Vip Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, Durg, C.G. (Guarantor And Partner Of M/s Kaiser Infra (Partnership Firm) Plot No. 14 Block 34 Nehru Nagar (West), Bhilai, Durg, C.G.). ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Uco Bank Through Its Branch Manager Branch Address Civic Centre, Bhilai, Durg, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12/02/2026 1. By way of this revision, the applicant has prayed for following reliefs:- “A. Set aside the impugned order dated 18.11.2025 passed by the learned Trial Court, Durg, in CS A 82/2025, whereby the plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on ground of jurisdiction barred by Section 34 SARFAESI Act, C. Direct the learned Trial Court to proceed with the suit and decide the same on merits after recording evidence; D. Pass an order of interim stay on the impugned order during pendency of the present revision petition; E. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file an appropriate appeal or proceedings before the appropriate forum/Court and prays that certified copy of the impugned order as well as the certified copies of the documents may be directed to be returned while keeping the photocopy of the same. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the revision petition is 3 dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 5. The Registry is directed to return the relevant copies of the revision to the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat