HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Bail App No.104/2026 Parvaiz Ahmed .....Petitioner(s) Through :- None. v/s Union Territory of J&K .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 07.07.2026 01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last two consecutive dates of hearing i.e., 29.05.2026 and 01.06.2026. Thereafter, the matter was listed before the Court on 05.06.2026, on which date notice was issued. Subsequently, when the matter came up for consideration on 22.06.2026, none appeared on behalf of either of the parties. Today also, when the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s), if any. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 07.07.2026 Shammi Sr. No. 04 SHAMMI KUMAR 2026.07.07 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document