- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23279 RSA No. 1622 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1622 OF 2024 (MON) BETWEEN: SRI K. NARENDRABABU S/O, K. ADINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS AGRICULTURIST / BUSINESS R/AT CHELUR VILLAGE, BAGEPALLI TALUK. NOW R/AT OPPOSITE M.V.J. COLLEGE MAIN GATE CHANNASANDRA MAIN ROAD 83RD WARD, 2ND MAIN ROAD A.K.G. COLONY, CHANNASANDRA KADUGODI, BENGALURU - 560 067. …APPELLANT (BY SRI JAGADISH J.R., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI VENKATARATNAM S/O. LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS AGRICULTURIST / BUSINESS R/AT CHELUR VILLAGE / HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK - 563 124. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI GANGI REDDY B.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 42 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23279 RSA No. 1622 of 2024 DECREE 19.08.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.23/2024 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.03.2020 PASSED IN OS NO.107/2018 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BAGEPALLI AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent are present. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that the matter has been amicably settled before the Executing Court and that he has already filed a memo to that effect. 3. Learned counsel for respondent concurs with the submissions made by the learned counsel for appellant. Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn, Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23279 RSA No. 1622 of 2024 appellant upon the appellant furnishing the necessary Bank details within two weeks and thereafter effect the refund by way of RTGS. In view of above, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19