Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17 (ALL)

AMIT JAYANTILAL PITADIYA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/3572/2026 · 2026-02-16

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3572 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Shri Ajay Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Amit Jayantilal Pitadiya, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 136 of 2024, under Sections 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of I.T. Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Agra. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 21.11.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Ravi Kumar Suryavanshi has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 11.6.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4079 of 2025. He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Gaur, Karmendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Jayantilal Pitadiya .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Amit Jayantilal Pitadiya, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. February 17, 2026 Ravi Prakash BAIL No. 3572 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad