Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16998 (JHR)

ABHISHEK YADAV ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5387/2026 · 2026-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17738 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5387 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar Yadav, aged about 22 years, S/o-Yogendra Yadav, R/o Jayantigram, P.O.-Mahadeoganj, P.S.- Sahibganj, District-Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate : Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.92 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1-B) a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was instrumental in murder of Rajkumar Yadav @ Mugli Yadav. It is next submitted that the direct allegation is upon Bittu Kumar Yadav of committing murder of the said Rajkumar Yadav @ Mugli Yadav, but the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner kept the weapon of offence being the country made pistol in his field at the instance of Bittu Kumar Yadav. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-17 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is then submitted that the co-accused Bittu Kumar Yadav has already been granted bail. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.04.2026 as is evident from para- 01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.92 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 18/06/2026 Abhiraj/